Obviously, it is monotonous. One, single profile. Like "Star Wars Episode II". Those clones.

Also, often questioned if it has a mind or not. In Japan, there're many that have minds to help people against evils.

Oops, is it a robot? Robot isn't it "A.I."?

Definition.

"the study and design of intelligent agents," where an intelligent agent is a system that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chances of success.

Okay, so "A.I." has a goal by definition, lives to achieve a goal. This sounds, nothing to do with "intelligence". Or, "intelligence" is an ability to achieve a goal!?

Again, the definition.

Intelligence is an umbrella term describing a property of the mind comprehending related abilities, such as the capacities for abstract thought, reasoning, planning, problem solving, speech, and learning.

A property of the mind. But it should not be of oneself, but of others. It is "others" that think someone as "INTELLIGENT".

So, it doesn't matter if it has mind or is clever and perfect.

Is it safe to redefine "INTELLIGENT" as "RELIABLE"? You can count on it. Then, it is "INTELLIGENT". Like us for human, it is not entirely, but on a specific field/situation. "RELIABLE" needs a small print.

No, but are we "RELIABLE"? No. I could label us "NOT RELIABLE".

Yet, we can accept it. Then, we can get along with.

We expect something perfect. But nothing. Plus and Minus. Up and Down. I guess, it's easier to get along with such a "NOT RELIABLE". Someone perfect must be empty or too disciplined.

So, I guess we have an ability to recognize a certain character. It is a key. Then, we can get along with. A "character". It seems to be the realistic and helpful direction of "A.I.".